From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 22, 2018
138 S. Ct. 925 (2018)

Summary

holding retroactive application of SORNA I violated ex post facto clause

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Kling

Opinion

No. 17–575.

01-22-2018

PENNSYLVANIA, petitioner, v. Jose M. MUNIZ.


Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District denied.


Summaries of

Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 22, 2018
138 S. Ct. 925 (2018)

holding retroactive application of SORNA I violated ex post facto clause

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Kling

holding retroactive application of SORNA I violated ex post facto clause

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Kling
Case details for

Pennsylvania v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:PENNSYLVANIA, petitioner, v. Jose M. MUNIZ.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 22, 2018

Citations

138 S. Ct. 925 (2018)
200 L. Ed. 2d 213

Citing Cases

Lusik v. Pa. State Police

Our Supreme Court held that SORNA was unconstitutional in Commonwealth v. Muniz , 164 A.3d 1189, 1222 (Pa.…

Groulx v. Pa. State Police

(Amended Petition ¶¶ 18-20 (citing Commonwealth v. Muniz , 164 A.3d 1189, 1193 (Pa. 2017), cert. denied sub…