From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennsbury Village v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 29, 2009
966 A.2d 547 (Pa. 2009)

Opinion

No. 410 MAL 2008.

January 29, 2009.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 410 MAL 2008 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Prior Report: Pa.Cmwlth., 949 A.2d 956.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of January 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioner, are:

1. Did the Commonwealth Court ruling render settlement contracts resolving land use disputes which arguably relate to an environmental law or regulation unenforceable and deprive citizens of the right to resolve their disputes via settlement agreements?

2. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act in the instant matter in which the purposes of the Act were not implicated?

3. Did the Commonwealth Court misapply the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that a deed restriction is an environmental law or regulation?

4. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that the business relationship exception to the Act did not apply to this case?


Summaries of

Pennsbury Village v. McIntyre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 29, 2009
966 A.2d 547 (Pa. 2009)
Case details for

Pennsbury Village v. McIntyre

Case Details

Full title:PENNSBURY VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner v. Aaron McINTYRE, Alma…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 29, 2009

Citations

966 A.2d 547 (Pa. 2009)
966 A.2d 547

Citing Cases

Pennsbury Village Associates, LLC v. McIntyre

4. Did the Commonwealth Court err in applying and analyzing the Environmental Immunity Act by holding that…