Opinion
September, 1926.
Present — Clark, Davis, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Pennock v. Rochester Ice Cream Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Summaries of
Pennock v. Rochester Ice Cream Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 1, 1926
217 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for
Pennock v. Rochester Ice Cream Company
Case Details
Full title:ORRA PENNOCK, Respondent, v. ROCHESTER ICE CREAM COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Sep 1, 1926
Citations
217 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)