From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennington v. U.S. Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 1, 2017
169 A.3d 1080 (Pa. 2017)

Opinion

No. 59 EAL 2017

08-01-2017

Harold PENNINGTON and Nancy Pennington v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, CRC Industries, Inc., Sunoco, Inc. (R & M) f/k/a Sun Company Inc., Genuine Parts Company d/b/a NAPA, Berryman Products, Inc., Safety–Kleen Systems, Inc., Shell Oil Company, Univar USA, Inc., f/k/a Chemcentral Corp., and Van Waters Rodgers, Inc., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Corporation, Radiator Specialty Company, Hunt Oil Company, Hunt Refining Company, Chevron USA, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Gulf Oil Company, Union Oil Company of California d/b/a Unocal, individually and as successor in interest to American Mineral Spirits Company, Ford Motor Company, 3M Company Petition of: Hunt Refining Company


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

It is further ordered that the Application for Stay is DENIED.


Summaries of

Pennington v. U.S. Steel Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 1, 2017
169 A.3d 1080 (Pa. 2017)
Case details for

Pennington v. U.S. Steel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Harold PENNINGTON and Nancy Pennington v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Aug 1, 2017

Citations

169 A.3d 1080 (Pa. 2017)