From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennie & Edmonds v. F.E.I., Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 22, 1990
161 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 22, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.).


The plaintiff law firm seeks to recover the value of legal services incurred by defendant F.E.I., Ltd., in connection with the defense of an action brought against the defendant in New York County. Supreme Court granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and set the matter down for an assessment of damages. In its response to the notice to admit served by plaintiff in this action, defendant acknowledged that plaintiff was retained by the defendant, that services were provided, and that invoices were rendered to the defendant. In view of defendant's admissions, summary judgment was properly granted. "Since defendants have failed to present any evidentiary material sufficient to raise a triable factual issue in its defense of the contract, quantum meruit and account stated claims, plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment thereon, at least as to liability" (Otterbourg, Steindler, Houston Rosen v. Shreve City Apts., 147 A.D.2d 327, 334).

Concur — Ross, J.P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Pennie & Edmonds v. F.E.I., Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 22, 1990
161 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Pennie & Edmonds v. F.E.I., Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:PENNIE EDMONDS, Respondent, v. F.E.I., LTD., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 22, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 475 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
555 N.Y.S.2d 742

Citing Cases

Sovereign Bank v. American Elite Props. Inc.

Further, the AEP defendants' argument that Parimist failed to document the parties' respective obligations…

Sovereign Bank v. Am. Elite Prop. Inc.

Further, the AEP defendants' argument that Parimist failed to document the parties' respective obligations…