From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennicott v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 1, 2022
21 Civ. 4575 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

21 Civ. 4575 (LGS)

11-01-2022

MARCIA PENNICOTT, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, DISTRICT JUDGE:

WHEREAS, the Orders at Dkt. Nos. 40 and 42 permitted Plaintiff to seek leave to amend her pleadings, but instructed Plaintiff that her pleadings could not be amended or supplemented without the Court's leave;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a purported Third Amended Complaint at Dkt. No. 43. It is hereby

ORDERED that the Court will construe Plaintiff's filing at Dkt. No. 43 as a motion for leave to file the Third Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15. It is further

ORDERED that Defendants may file a letter response to said motion by November 22, 2022.


Summaries of

Pennicott v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 1, 2022
21 Civ. 4575 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Pennicott v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:MARCIA PENNICOTT, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

21 Civ. 4575 (LGS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 1, 2022)