From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennick v. Thompson

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 30, 2011
NO. C11-5175 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

NO. C11-5175 RBL/KLS.

August 30, 2011


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. ECF No. 11. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "[a] party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within (A) 21 days after serving it, or (B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e) or (f), whichever is earlier." Otherwise, the party "may amend the party's pleading with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires." Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2).

Plaintiff filed his proposed complaint on March 3, 2011. ECF No. 1. The complaint was served on Defendant Dawn Thompson in April, 2011. ECF Nos. 7 and 8. Defendant Thompson has not filed an answer to the complaint. Instead, she filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. Prior to filing a response to the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff filed a motion to amend, to which he attached a proposed "Amended Verified Complaint." ECF No. 11; 11-2. The proposed amended complaint contains a verification, but it is not signed. ECF No. 11-2.

Defendant Thompson is not opposed to Plaintiff's motion to amend. ECF No. 15. Defendant Thompson contends that the amended pleading does not cure any of the deficiencies noted in her motion to dismiss and that the amended complaint raises the same issues as the original complaint. She asks that the Court decide her motion to dismiss by applying it to the amended complaint. Id.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED.

(2) The Clerk shall file Plaintiff's proposed Amended Verified Complaint (ECF No. 11-2) as Plaintiff's amended complaint. The Clerk is also directed to send a copy of page 9 of the amended complaint to Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall, within fifteen (15) days of this Order, date and sign Page 9 of the amended complaint and return it to the Clerk for filing.

(3) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants.


Summaries of

Pennick v. Thompson

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Aug 30, 2011
NO. C11-5175 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Pennick v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:CURLIN PENNICK, III, Plaintiff, v. DAWN THOMPSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

NO. C11-5175 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 30, 2011)