From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennick v. McLendon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 26, 2018
CASE NO. C18-5857 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 26, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. C18-5857 BHS-JRC

12-26-2018

CURLIN PENNICK III, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MCLENDON, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 5. The Court having considered the R&R and the remaining record, and no objections having been filed, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED;

(2) Because plaintiff has already brought at least three unsuccessful suits that were malicious, frivolous, or failed to state a claim, plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. 4, is denied under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and
(3) Plaintiff is directed to produce the $400.00 filing fee within thirty days of the entry of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of Plaintiff's action without prejudice for failure to provide the filing fee.

Dated this 26th day of December, 2018.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pennick v. McLendon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Dec 26, 2018
CASE NO. C18-5857 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 26, 2018)
Case details for

Pennick v. McLendon

Case Details

Full title:CURLIN PENNICK III, Plaintiff, v. DAVID MCLENDON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Dec 26, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. C18-5857 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Dec. 26, 2018)