From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pennewell v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0598 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0598 DFL EFB P.

April 27, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 29, 2007, petitioner requested an extension of time to file and serve a reply. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). At the time he made his request, he did not need an extension. However, the time for filing a reply has passed.

Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that petitioner's March 29, 2007, request is granted and petitioner has 30 days from the date of this order to file a reply.


Summaries of

Pennewell v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2007
No. CIV S-06-0598 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Pennewell v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:RONALD PENNEWELL, Petitioner, v. TOM CAREY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0598 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2007)