From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penna. Manu. Assoc. Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 28, 1977
370 A.2d 855 (N.J. 1977)

Summary

deciding claim under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9, a predecessor of the current PIP recovery statute

Summary of this case from David v. Government Employees Ins. Co.

Opinion

Argued November 8, 1976 —

Decided February 28, 1977.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Alan R. Schmoll argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Capehart Scatchard, attorneys).

Mr. Roy D. Cummins argued the cause for respondent. Messrs. Moss, Powell Powers submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae New Jersey Defense Association ( Mr. William R. Powers, Jr. on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Penna. Manu. Assoc. Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 28, 1977
370 A.2d 855 (N.J. 1977)

deciding claim under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-9, a predecessor of the current PIP recovery statute

Summary of this case from David v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
Case details for

Penna. Manu. Assoc. Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 28, 1977

Citations

370 A.2d 855 (N.J. 1977)
370 A.2d 855

Citing Cases

Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. v. New Hampshire

For the reasons to be stated, it is the opinion of this court that they cannot. Pennsylvania Mfrs. Ass'n Ins.…

Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Brothers, Inc.

However, the right was a limited one. It could be exercised only against the insurer of the tortfeasor, and…