From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penn v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2256 FCD CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2256 FCD CKD P.

August 15, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 1, 2001, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 1, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants McDonald, Woodford, Keating, Griffith, Barron and Wedemeyer are dismissed from this case.

DATED: August 12, 2011.


Summaries of

Penn v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2256 FCD CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Penn v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:MARLIN PENN, Plaintiff, v. McDONALD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 15, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2256 FCD CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011)