From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penn v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2443 KJM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-2443 KJM JFM (PC)

08-08-2011

MARLIN PENN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN McDONALD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On July 21, 2011, the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller adopted the undersigned's March 28, 2011 findings and recommendations recommending that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted. Judgment was entered accordingly. On July 29, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel so as to correct certain alleged factual inaccuracies in defendants' motion for summary judgment. Because this matter is now closed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel is denied as moot.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ____


Summaries of

Penn v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 8, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-2443 KJM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)
Case details for

Penn v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:MARLIN PENN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN McDONALD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 8, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-2443 KJM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2011)