holding no substantive due process violation where city officials constructed sewer lines for Plaintiff pursuant to writ of mandamus
Summary of this case from Painter v. DoeNo. 94-1946.
October 2, 1995.
C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 46 F. 3d 325.
holding no substantive due process violation where city officials constructed sewer lines for Plaintiff pursuant to writ of mandamus
Summary of this case from Painter v. Doerequiring basic and ancillary services to be provided only in nursing home, rather than in recipient's home
Summary of this case from Lane v. Kitzhabercharacterizing overall language in Title II as "broad"
Summary of this case from Liberty Resources v. Southeastern Penn. Transp.providing detailed history of acts
Summary of this case from Liberty Resources v. Southeastern Penn. Transp.characterizing overall language in Title II as "broad"
Summary of this case from Liberty Resources v. Southeastern Penn. Transp. Auth.providing detailed history of acts
Summary of this case from Liberty Resources v. Southeastern Penn. Transp. Auth.Full title:PENNSYLVANIA SECRETARY OF PUBLIC WELFARE v. IDELL S
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 2, 1995
Plaintiffs in similar cases also have averred that community-based care is less expensive than institutional…
Bellaire Corp. v. ShalalaThe history of the Coal Act has been well chronicled. See, e.g., Davon, Inc. v. Shalala, 75 F.3d 1114, 1127…