From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penguin Air Conditioning Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 2, 2021
20-CV-3377 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-3377 (JMF)

11-02-2021

PENGUIN AIR CONDITIONING CORP. et al Plaintiffs, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CO., Defendant.


ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge:

In light of the fact that all claims ripe for adjudication have been resolved, see ECF Nos. 45 and 48, the Court sees no reason to keep this case in active status. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close the case - without prejudice to Plaintiffs' right to reopen the action within thirty days of the resolution of the Underlying Action, Dorset v. 285 Madison Owner, LLC, No. 157440/14 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jan. 16, 2015). To be clear, upon resolution of the Underlying Action, Plaintiffs need only file a motion to reopen this case; there is no need to file a new suit. That said, any motion to reopen must be filed by the aforementioned deadline ; any motion to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively close the case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Penguin Air Conditioning Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 2, 2021
20-CV-3377 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Penguin Air Conditioning Corp. v. Travelers Indem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PENGUIN AIR CONDITIONING CORP. et al Plaintiffs, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 2, 2021

Citations

20-CV-3377 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2021)