From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Penesa v. Cal. Inst. for Women

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 28, 2018
Case No. EDCV 16-01878 DMG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 16-01878 DMG (RAO)

08-28-2018

MANISHA L. PENESA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint, the Interim Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Interim Report"), Plaintiff's Objections, and all other records and files herein. Further, the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Interim Report to which objections have been made. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. /// /// ///

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED-IN-PART and Defendants Wamil, Lopez, Martel and Hughes are dismissed from this action with prejudice and without leave to amend;

(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED-IN-PART as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Reyes; and

(3) Defendant Reyes shall file an Answer to the Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment claims against her within 14 days of the date of entry of this order.
DATED: August 28, 2018

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Penesa v. Cal. Inst. for Women

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 28, 2018
Case No. EDCV 16-01878 DMG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Penesa v. Cal. Inst. for Women

Case Details

Full title:MANISHA L. PENESA, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 28, 2018

Citations

Case No. EDCV 16-01878 DMG (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2018)