From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pendergraft v. State

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Sep 6, 2011
Case No. 6:11-cv-1116-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 6:11-cv-1116-Orl-31KRS.

September 6, 2011


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On July 7, 2011, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to serve the Defendants "expeditiously" with the Complaint and the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 3), and to notify the Court when this had been accomplished, so that the Court could schedule the motion for a hearing. (Doc. 4 at 2-3). Two months have passed, and the Plaintiff has not notified the Court that any sort of service has been accomplished.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 3) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff may reassert the motion, if he desires, after he has properly served the Defendants.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Pendergraft v. State

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Sep 6, 2011
Case No. 6:11-cv-1116-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Pendergraft v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES S. PENDERGRAFT, IV, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF FLORIDA; AGENCY FOR…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Sep 6, 2011

Citations

Case No. 6:11-cv-1116-Orl-31KRS (M.D. Fla. Sep. 6, 2011)