From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pendelton v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 8, 2003
305 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93191

Decided and Entered: May 8, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

William J. Pendelton Jr., Auburn, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of unauthorized use of a controlled substance. The Attorney General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Canzater-Smith v. Goord, 300 A.D.2d 726).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Pendelton v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 8, 2003
305 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Pendelton v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM J. PENDELTON JR., Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 8, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 908