From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pena v. Scrip, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 22, 2013
CIV 11-1102 GBW/WDS (D.N.M. Mar. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CIV 11-1102 GBW/WDS

03-22-2013

CHARLIE PENA, Plaintiff, v. SCRIP, INC., d/b/a/ Massage Warehouse, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE

PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT WITNESSES

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses (Doc. No. 48). Defendant claims Plaintiff failed to properly disclose his experts and failed to make them available for deposition. Plaintiff identified his medical experts generically in the JSR and provided releases. Dr. Rasty, the liability expert, was also identified in the JSR and a report was disclosed in June of 2012. The medical witnesses do not have to produce a report if testifying as to their treatment. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C), however, if not producing a report they must provide a summary of facts and opinions to which they will testify. Plaintiff should comply with that requirement.

The question of whether any witness shall testify at trial is one for the presiding judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses (Doc. No. 48) is denied with the caveat that Plaintiff shall expeditiously provide statements of fact and opinion as set out above. This should occur in advance of the depositions so no further delay occurs.

______________________

W. Daniel Schneider

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Pena v. Scrip, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 22, 2013
CIV 11-1102 GBW/WDS (D.N.M. Mar. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Pena v. Scrip, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE PENA, Plaintiff, v. SCRIP, INC., d/b/a/ Massage Warehouse…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 22, 2013

Citations

CIV 11-1102 GBW/WDS (D.N.M. Mar. 22, 2013)