From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pena v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 9, 2020
No. 18-70381 (9th Cir. Jun. 9, 2020)

Opinion

No. 18-70381

06-09-2020

MARVIN GEOVANNY MARTINEZ PENA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A201-045-323 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Marvin Geovanny Martinez Pena, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying his motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in declining to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel where Martinez Pena did not show prejudice from the untimely filing of his previous motion to reopen. See Ray v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 582, 587-89 (9th Cir. 2006) (requiring prejudice to demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel).

In light of this disposition, we need not reach Martinez Pena's remaining contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (courts and agencies are not required to decide issues unnecessary to the results they reach).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Pena v. Barr

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 9, 2020
No. 18-70381 (9th Cir. Jun. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Pena v. Barr

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN GEOVANNY MARTINEZ PENA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 9, 2020

Citations

No. 18-70381 (9th Cir. Jun. 9, 2020)