From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelton v. Barns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:12-CV-221-TMH (M.D. Ala. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:12-CV-221-TMH

04-16-2012

QUANTERIO PELTON, Plaintiff, v. LEE BARNS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. #4) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The Recommendation (Doc. #4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;
2. Plaintiff's claim challenging the constitutionality of his bail/bond amount is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
3. Plaintiff's false imprisonment claim is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); and
4. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process. A separate judgment shall issue.

Truman M. Hobbs

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pelton v. Barns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:12-CV-221-TMH (M.D. Ala. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Pelton v. Barns

Case Details

Full title:QUANTERIO PELTON, Plaintiff, v. LEE BARNS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:12-CV-221-TMH (M.D. Ala. Apr. 16, 2012)