From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pellock v. Schenectady Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1916
113 N.E. 1062 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 10, 1916

Decided May 30, 1916

Daniel Naylon, Jr., for appellant.

William Dewey Loucks for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Pellock v. Schenectady Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1916
113 N.E. 1062 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Pellock v. Schenectady Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES S. PELLOCK, as Administratrix of the Estate of JOHN PELLOCK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 30, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1062 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1062