From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 1933
237 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

February 17, 1933.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Bronx County.

Charles Novello, for the appellants.

Joseph A. Sarafite of counsel [ Louis J. Naftalison with him on the brief; Sarafite Naftalison, attorneys], for the respondent.

Present — FINCH, P.J., MARTIN, O'MALLEY, SHERMAN and TOWNLEY, JJ.


No triable issue is presented by the answering affidavit. The mortgage is concededly past due and no consideration has been shown for the alleged extension agreement. The exact amount due may be determined before a referee appointed to compute.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.


Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 17, 1933
237 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Pellino v. 3232 Hull Avenue Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO PELLINO and Another, Appellants, v. 3232 HULL AVENUE REALTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 17, 1933

Citations

237 App. Div. 759 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
264 N.Y.S. 214

Citing Cases

Shepard v. Wheaton

The present statute and Supreme Court rules expressly provide that in any action, including a counterclaim at…