From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pellegrino v. Robert Half Intern., Inc.

Supreme Court of California
Apr 28, 2010
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 191 (Cal. 2010)

Opinion


Page __

__ Cal.4th __ 229 P.3d 100, 108 Cal.Rptr.3d 191 PELLEGRINO (Maria) v. ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, INC. No. S180849 Supreme Court of California April 28, 2010

         Prior report: __ Cal.App. __, 104 Cal.Rptr.3d 790.

          OPINION

         [108 Cal.Rptr.3d 192] Petition for review granted; briefing deferred (rule 8.512(d)(2)).

          The petition for review is granted.

         Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Harris v. Superior Court (Liberty Mutual), S156555 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court.

         GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, MORENO, and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pellegrino v. Robert Half Intern., Inc.

Supreme Court of California
Apr 28, 2010
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 191 (Cal. 2010)
Case details for

Pellegrino v. Robert Half Intern., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PELLEGRINO (Maria) v. ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 28, 2010

Citations

108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 191 (Cal. 2010)
229 P.3d 100

Citing Cases

Nordstrom Com. Cases

Taylor argues Nordstrom could not have had a good faith belief its actions were proper because the right to…