Opinion
June 22, 2000.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered on or about October 15, 1999, which, inter alia, denied defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 to the extent of sustaining one cause of action for defamation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Jeffrey M. Duban, for plaintiff-respondent.
William S. Adams, for defendants-appellants.
Before: Ellerin, J.P., Rubin, Buckley, Friedman, JJ.
Inasmuch as plaintiff, in his book, "Unearthing Atlantis: An Archaeological Odyssey", clearly attributed the theory of Thera-as-Atlantis to Spyridon Marinatos, defendant Ellis's statement that, "he [plaintiff] manages to imply that the idea was originated with him" was patently false and susceptible of defamatory meaning, since the average reader of the book by Ellis in which the complained of statement appeared would likely have been left with the impression that plaintiff had publicly taken credit for originating a theory that was not his own (see,Armstrong v. Simon Schuster, 85 N.Y.2d 373). The statement was accordingly actionable and the cause of action for defamation premised upon the statement was properly sustained.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.