From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Di Leo v. Catanzaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District
Nov 30, 1921
115 A. 925 (Conn. 1921)

Opinion

Submitted on briefs October 26th, 1921

Decided November 30th, 1921.

ACTION to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff's decedent, alleged to have been caused by the defendant's negligence, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Banks, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $3,500, and appeal by defendant Filippo Catanzaro. No error.

Nathaniel R. Bronson, Lawrence L. Lewis and Charles E. Hart, Jr., for the appellant (defendant Filippo Catanzaro).

Francis P. Guilfoile, for the appellee (plaintiff).


Examination of the evidence shows that the motion to correct the finding is almost in its entirety wholly without merit; the rest of the motion is without significance and, if granted, could not affect the questions of law involved in the appeal. Unless the finding be corrected the claimed errors of law, as the appellant concedes, cannot be successfully pursued.


Summaries of

Di Leo v. Catanzaro

Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District
Nov 30, 1921
115 A. 925 (Conn. 1921)
Case details for

Di Leo v. Catanzaro

Case Details

Full title:PELLEGRINO DI LEO, ADMINISTRATOR, vs. FILIPPO CATANZARO ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut Third Judicial District

Date published: Nov 30, 1921

Citations

115 A. 925 (Conn. 1921)
96 Conn. 725