From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelham Oil Fertilizer Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 16, 1949
173 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 12503.

April 20, 1949. Rehearing Denied May 16, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; Robert L. Russell, Judge.

Suit by the United States against the Pelham Oil Fertilizer Company and others to recover balance alleged to be due on contract price of peanuts sold by Commodity Credit Corporation to the named defendant. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

Alex W. Smith and Croom Partridge, both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

Lewis A. Sigler, Asst. Associate Sol., of Washington, D.C., U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, and John P. Cowart, U.S. Atty., and Jack J. Gautier, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Macon, Ga., for appellee.

Before HOLMES, McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.


This suit was brought by the United States to recover a balance of $8,242.14, plus interest, alleged to be due on the contract price of peanuts sold by the Commodity Credit Corporation to Pelham Oil Fertilizer Company in the year 1943. The peanuts were destroyed by fire while in the possession of the appellant as purchaser, and under certain provisions of the contract between the parties it is alleged that appellant, Pelham Oil Fertilizer Company, is liable for the contract price regardless of the loss.

We consider it unnecessary to comment at length upon all the facts and circumstances surrounding the execution of the contract in question, or to present any detailed analysis of its various provisions. It is sufficient to observe that the decision of the trial court is amply supported by the evidence and well established contractual principles. The contract before us is clear and unambiguous, and plain to the effect that both parties contemplated appellant was bound, within the limits of its government allocation from the War Food Administrator, to repurchase the peanuts for shelling purposes as soon as it acquired them from the producers for the account of the Commodity Credit Corporation. Under such circumstances, the resale of the peanuts to appellant had been fully consummated prior to the time of their loss by the fire, and appellants are therefore liable for their contract purchase price, plus interest from the date it was due. McKinney v. Battle Brothers, 13 Ga. App. 255, 79 S.E. 92; Moon v. Wright, 12 Ga. App. 659, 78 S.E. 141; Avery Co. v. Middlebrooks, 142 Ga. 830, 83 S.E. 944; Columbus Bagging Tie Co. v. Steel Union Company, Inc., 43 Ga. App. 126, 158 S.E. 459; 47 Amer. Juris., Sales, Sec. 877, p. 81; Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States, 313 U.S. 289, 61 S.Ct. 995, 85 L.Ed. 1361.

We find no reversible error in the record, and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.


Summaries of

Pelham Oil Fertilizer Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 16, 1949
173 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Pelham Oil Fertilizer Co. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PELHAM OIL FERTILIZER CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 16, 1949

Citations

173 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

United States v. Greenwood Products Co.

The original contract (paragraph 8) required the sheller to repurchase peanuts for his own account until his…

Greenwood Products Co. v. United States

In these circumstances, the sale of the allocated peanuts was so far complete as to constitute Greenwood the…