From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelfrey v. Pelfrey

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1991
810 P.2d 412 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

D8910-67993; CA A64838

Argued and submitted March 22, 1991

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Lewis Bridgers Lawrence, Judge pro tempore. (June 15, 1990, Judgment)

Lawrence R. Weisberg, Judge pro tempore. (March 23, 1990, Judgment)

Lawrence D. Gorin, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Keller, Gottlieb Gorin, Portland.

Meg E. Kieran, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warren, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Riggs, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Judgments vacated and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.


Defendant appeals two judgments for contempt of court, arising out of two separate violations of an order issued under the Abuse Prevention Act. ORS 107.00 et seq. He contends that the trial courts erred because, although they both found that his actions were done wilfully, they failed to make a finding of bad intent to support the contempt judgments. We agree. State ex rel Oregon State Bar v. Wright, 280 Or. 713, 573 P.2d 294 (1977); Couey and Couey, 105 Or. App. 478, 805 P.2d 716 (1991). Accordingly, we vacate the judgments and remand for findings on the issue of bad intent. If the courts find the requisite bad intent, the judgments shall be reinstated. Defendant's remaining assignments are without merit.

Judgments vacated and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.


Summaries of

Pelfrey v. Pelfrey

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 22, 1991
810 P.2d 412 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Pelfrey v. Pelfrey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of Gayle L. PELFREY, Petitioner, and Henry…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 22, 1991

Citations

810 P.2d 412 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
810 P.2d 412