From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelegrina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 6, 2000
763 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 1D99-256

Opinion filed June 6, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Jere Tolton, Judge.

Stephen G. Cobb, Shalimar, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Because the plea agreement permitted a sentence at the trial court's discretion, we affirm the denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). However, because it appears from the record that the parties (including appellant and his attorney) may have been under the mistaken impression that the 1995 sentencing guidelines, rather than the 1992, were applicable, and that, pursuant to the latter, the maximum permissible sentence would have been significantly shorter than that imposed pursuant to the former, our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's right timely to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 seeking to withdraw his plea.

MINER, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Pelegrina v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 6, 2000
763 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Pelegrina v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAUL PELEGRINA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 6, 2000

Citations

763 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Peterhoff v. State

We affirm the trial court's denial of James Peterhoff's motion to correct illegal sentence brought pursuant…