From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pelayo v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 12, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1048 (W.D. La. Apr. 12, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1048

04-12-2015

JUAN MANUEL SAHAGUN PELAYO, Petitioner, v. C. MAIORANA Respondent.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 15] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, as well as the plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 16], and having determined that the findings of the Magistrate Judge, as amended in the accompanying Memorandum Ruling, are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner's application for Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. 1] be and hereby is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, because the court lacks jurisdiction to hear these claims.

Lake Charles, Louisiana, this 12 day of April, 2015.

/s/_________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pelayo v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 12, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1048 (W.D. La. Apr. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Pelayo v. Maiorana

Case Details

Full title:JUAN MANUEL SAHAGUN PELAYO, Petitioner, v. C. MAIORANA Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 12, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-1048 (W.D. La. Apr. 12, 2015)