From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pekera v. Purpora

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 11, 2004
841 A.2d 1191 (Conn. 2004)

Opinion

Decided February 11, 2004


The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 685 (AC 23546), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the plaintiff to amend his complaint?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17133.

John D. Jessep, in support of the petition.

Jeffrey R. Babbin, in opposition.


Summaries of

Pekera v. Purpora

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 11, 2004
841 A.2d 1191 (Conn. 2004)
Case details for

Pekera v. Purpora

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL R. PEKERA, ADMINISTRATOR (ESTATE OF CHARLENE WALKER), ET AL. v…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Feb 11, 2004

Citations

841 A.2d 1191 (Conn. 2004)
267 Conn. 919

Citing Cases

Pekera v. Purpora

We granted the plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the…