Summary
In Peikoff, the Court held that the language the employer included in its disclosure form was closely related to the disclosure—so closely related that it was inherently implausible anyone would include it in a willful attempt to violate the statute (or with reckless disregard for the requirements of the statute).
Summary of this case from Harris v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Opinion
15-cv-00068-VC
03-25-2015
MICHAEL PEIKOFF, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION, Defendant.
JUDGMENT
The Court, having dismissed this case with prejudice, now enters judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 25, 2015
/s/_________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge