From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pehlic v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 03-01306.

December 31, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Grow, J.), entered February 19, 2003, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

FELT EVANS, LLP, CLINTON (KENNETH L. BOBROW OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

GEORGE F. ANEY, HERKIMER, HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, SYRACUSE (JANET D. CALLAHAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Before: PRESENT: PINE, J.P., WISNER, HURLBUTT, KEHOE, AND HAYES, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court, Oneida County, Grow, J.


Summaries of

Pehlic v. City of Utica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 2003
2 A.D.3d 1462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Pehlic v. City of Utica

Case Details

Full title:SEMSUDIN PEHLIC AND SABAN PEHLIC, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 1462 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
769 N.Y.S.2d 769