From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peffers v. Hilton Hotels Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 2001
279 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 23, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered January 3, 2000, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff fell on a stairway in defendant's hotel allegedly because the carpet on the stairway slipped, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint , unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered July 12, 2000, which deemed plaintiff's motion for "reconsideration, renewal and/or re-argument" as one for reargument, and, so considered, denied the motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Robert M. Ginsberg, for plaintiff-appellant.

David L. Metzger, for defendant-respondent.

Before: Williams, J.P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


The deposition of defendant's employees who frequently used the stairway in question that they never noticed any loose carpeting on the stairs either before or after plaintiff fell, and the absence of any entries concerning the stairway carpeting in the logbook kept by defendant to record complaints and incidents, established prima facie that defendant lacked notice of the allegedly defective carpet. In opposition, plaintiff came forward not with any evidence of how long the defect existed, how visible and apparent it was, or other evidence of notice (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837), but with the affidavit of an engineer that carpeting installed without rods must have been attached to the stairs with some type of adhesive material which over time could have lost its holding strength, causing the carpet to move when people descend the stairs. However, such opinion is unavailing since a showing of defective installation would not permit a further inference that the looseness of the carpet actually existed and was visible and apparent for a sufficient length of time to permit defendant to discover and remedy it (see, id.). We have considered plaintiff's other arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Peffers v. Hilton Hotels Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 2001
279 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Peffers v. Hilton Hotels Corporation

Case Details

Full title:JANET PEFFERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 23, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

O'Brien v. Hilton Hotels Corp.

Before: Friedman, J.P., McGuire, Moskowitz, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ. There is no evidence in the record that…

Engler v. Kalmanowitz

She failed, however, by either her witnesses or her expert, to show that defendants had notice of this…