From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peets v. Sagar, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD

01-18-2012

DARLENE PEETS, Plaintiff, v. SAGAR, INC., PAKSN, INC., Defendants.

GORDON & REES LLP Michael T. Lucey Stephanie B. Wersel Attorneys for DEFENDANTS SAGAR, INC. and PAKSN, INC. HIGHMAN, HIGHMAN & BALL Louis A. Highman Attorneys for PLAINTIFF DARLENE PEETS


MICHAEL T. LUCEY (CSB NO. 099927)

STEPHANIE B. WERSEL (CSB NO. 253759)

GORDON & REES LLP

Attorneys for Defendants

SAGAR, INC. AND PAKSN, INC.

LOUIS A. HIGHMAN

Highman, Highman & Ball

Attorney for Plaintiff DARLENE PEETS

STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING ARBITRATION

Plaintiff Darlene Peets ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Sagar, Inc. ("Sagar") and Paksn, Inc. hereby stipulate to the following:

WHEREAS Sagar contends that Peets entered into a written agreement providing for final and binding mandatory arbitration of all employment-related disputes, including the dispute addressed in this action;

WHEREAS Peets disputes the validity and enforceability of the arbitration agreement;

WHEREAS the above-referenced parties have worked out a resolution of the dispute, the identity of the arbitrator, and the procedures on how the arbitration will be conducted, and HEREBY STIPULATE as follows;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their attorneys of record, that the instant action be stayed and that the matter referred to binding arbitration. The parties will advise the court upon the conclusion of that process regarding the result of the arbitration.

GORDON & REES LLP

By: Stephanie Wersel

Michael T. Lucey

Stephanie B. Wersel

Attorneys for DEFENDANTS SAGAR,

INC. and PAKSN, INC.

HIGHMAN, HIGHMAN & BALL

By: Louis A. Highman

Louis A. Highman

Attorneys for PLAINTIFF DARLENE

PEETS

ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore based on the above stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is stayed pending completion of binding arbitration. The status conference set for January 23, 2012 is vacated.

____________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Peets v. Sagar, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Peets v. Sagar, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE PEETS, Plaintiff, v. SAGAR, INC., PAKSN, INC., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)