From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 7, 1985
473 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-2234.

August 7, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; Edward Rodgers, Judge.

Jeffrey B. Smith of Cooper, Shahady, Frazier, Pugatch Meyer, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Kathleen J. Kroll of Baskin Steingut, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee — Melvin T. Goldberger.


We reverse and remand to permit the lower court to make a specific and explicit finding regarding a complete absence of a justiciable issue pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes (1983). Whitten v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co., 410 So.2d 501 (Fla. 1982); see also Fox v. Loeffler, 434 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). Our examination of the record confirms the existence of a basis for such a finding.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 7, 1985
473 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Peerless Electric Co. v. Goldberger

Case Details

Full title:PEERLESS ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 7, 1985

Citations

473 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Rawls v. Roberts

Therefore, we reverse and remand for the trial court to correct its technically deficient order. See Peerless…

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Stewart Title Guar. Co.

BUT, the trial court's order is technically deficient because it fails to include a specific finding…