From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peekskill Community Hospital v. Sayres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1982
88 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

May 24, 1982


In an action to recover damages and for other relief for wrongfully procuring assets of a decedent, defendant William Sayres, Jr., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), entered August 10, 1981, as denied his cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Order modified by adding a provision thereto transferring the case to the Surrogate's Court, Westchester County. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. This case should be transferred to the Surrogate's Court because the alleged wrongs concern the unlawful conversion of the assets of a decedent's estate. Wherever possible, all litigation involving the property and funds of a decedent's estate should be disposed of in the Surrogate's Court ( Hollander v. Hollander, 42 A.D.2d 701; Shearn v. Lord, 16 Misc.2d 224; Mayer v. Goldhaber, 63 Misc.2d 605; Vormbaum v. Murrow, 118 N.Y.S.2d 341). Accordingly, Special Term should have exercised its power under article VI (§ 19, subd a) of the Constitution of the State of New York to direct the transfer to the Surrogate's Court ( Hollander v. Hollander, supra; Garland v. Raunheim, 29 A.D.2d 383). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peekskill Community Hospital v. Sayres

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 24, 1982
88 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Peekskill Community Hospital v. Sayres

Case Details

Full title:PEEKSKILL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Respondent, v. WILLIAM SAYRES, JR.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 24, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Berger v. Ickovicz

ar that this restriction has been superseded by provisions of the State Constitution, which empowers the…

Weizenecker v. Weizenecker

Thus, the plaintiff has stated a cause of action envisioned by the court in Caravaggio (Caravaggio v…