From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peeks v. Meier

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Nov 23, 2011
264 P.3d 1058 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

holding that comparative fault of an unknown truck driver should not have gone to the jury because there was no evidence that attributed fault to that party

Summary of this case from Lee v. Kaup Kattle Co.

Opinion

No. 105,648.

11-23-2011

Teresa PEEKS, Appellant, v. Erin MEIER, Appellee.

Joe Little, of Auburn, for appellant. Lee Barnett and Joel W. Riggs, of Larson & Blumreich, Chartered, of Topeka, for appellee.


Decision Without Published Opinion

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Peeks v. Meier

Court of Appeals of Kansas.
Nov 23, 2011
264 P.3d 1058 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011)

holding that comparative fault of an unknown truck driver should not have gone to the jury because there was no evidence that attributed fault to that party

Summary of this case from Lee v. Kaup Kattle Co.
Case details for

Peeks v. Meier

Case Details

Full title:Teresa PEEKS, Appellant, v. Erin MEIER, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Kansas.

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

264 P.3d 1058 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Lee v. Kaup Kattle Co.

See, e.g., Sandifer Motors, Inc. v. City of Roeland Park, 628 P.2d 239, 242 (Kan.Ct.App. 1981) (affirming…