From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peebles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jun 8, 1999
14 S.W.3d 614 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. ED 75062

June 8, 1999

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Robert S. Cohen.

JACQUELINE K. MCGREEVY, Louisiana, for appellant.

JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON, Atty. Gen., BRECK K. BURGESS, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before ROBERT G. DOWD, Jr., C.J., K. KAROHL, J. and L. MOONEY, J.


ORDER


Movant appeals denial of Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was convicted and sentenced on one count of assault in the first degree and one count of armed criminal action. The sentences were affirmed on appeal. State of Missouri v. Vivian Peebles, 943 S.W.2d 342 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact are supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Movant's assignments of ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit. Moreover, there is no evidentiary basis for finding that there is a reasonable probability that, but for defense counsel's alleged unprofessional errors, the result of the trial would have been any different. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The motion court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Peebles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five
Jun 8, 1999
14 S.W.3d 614 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Peebles v. State

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN PEEBLES, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five

Date published: Jun 8, 1999

Citations

14 S.W.3d 614 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)