From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedroncelli v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Mar 11, 2022
CIV 21-0454 JCH/KBM (D.N.M. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

CIV 21-0454 JCH/KBM

03-11-2022

LEONARD THOMAS PEDRONCELLI, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD

KAREN B. MOLZEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Commissioner's Opposed Motion to Seal Administrative Record (Doc. 19), filed on March 1, 2022. Therein, the Commissioner requested permission to lodge the Administrative Record in this case under permanent seal, allowing access to only the Court and case participants. Doc. 19. The Commissioner noted that the records of an administrative or agency proceeding are exempt from redaction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(b)(2). Id. ¶ 1. She further explained that the record in this case “is voluminous and contains sensitive personal and health related information” but that “[r]edacting the record would obscure a large portion of the record from the Court's view that is pertinent to the issues at bar.” Id. ¶¶ 3, 4. The Commissioner stated, however, that she contacted Plaintiff who did “not approve” the motion. Id. ¶ 9.

On March 2, 2022, the Court entered an Order giving Plaintiff until March 9, 2022, to file a response in opposition, if any, to the Commissioner's motion to seal. Doc. 21. Plaintiff did not file any response by the deadline imposed by the Court. Therefore, pursuant to this District's Local Rules, he is deemed to have consented to the Court granting the Commissioner's motion. D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.1 (b) ("The failure of a party to file and serve a response in opposition to a motion within the time prescribed for doing so constitutes consent to grant the motion.").

As the Court indicated in its March 2, 2022 Order, its general practice is to seal the administrative records in all social security cases pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a)-(d). Doc. 21. For the reasons articulated in the Commissioner's motion, sealing of the Administrative Record is warranted here.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Administrative Record (Doc. 20) lodged by the Commissioner in the above-referenced case shall be permanently sealed, and access shall be limited to the Court and the case participants only.


Summaries of

Pedroncelli v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Mar 11, 2022
CIV 21-0454 JCH/KBM (D.N.M. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Pedroncelli v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD THOMAS PEDRONCELLI, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

CIV 21-0454 JCH/KBM (D.N.M. Mar. 11, 2022)