From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedro G. v. S (In re Imani G.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 7, 2015
130 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-07-07

In re IMANI G., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Pedro G., et al., Respondents–Appellants, Administration for Children's Services, Petitioner–Respondent.

Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for Pedro G., appellant. Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for Marta C., appellant.



Law Offices of Randall S. Carmel, Syosset (Randall S. Carmel of counsel), for Pedro G., appellant. Law Office of Thomas R. Villecco, P.C., Jericho (Thomas R. Villecco of counsel), for Marta C., appellant.
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Scott Shorr of counsel), for respondent.

Kenneth M. Tuccillo, Hastings on Hudson, attorney for the child.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Clark V. Richardson, J.), entered on or about August 19, 2014, to the extent it brings up for review a fact-finding order, same court and Judge, entered on or about August 19, 2014, which found that respondent father had sexually abused the subject child and that respondent paternal grandmother had neglected the child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeals from fact-finding order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

The court's findings that the father had sexually abused the child in violation of various sections of article 130 of the Penal Law, and that the paternal grandmother had neglected her by failing to take action when the child reported the sexual abuse, are supported by a preponderance of the evidence, including the sworn testimony of the child, which the court found credible ( seeFamily Ct. Act § 1012[e][iii], [f][i][B] ). There is no basis to disturb the court's credibility determination ( see Matter of Irene O., 38 N.Y.2d 776, 777, 381 N.Y.S.2d 865, 345 N.E.2d 337 [1975]; Matter of Daniela R. [Daniel R.], 118 A.D.3d 637, 637, 988 N.Y.S.2d 185 [1st Dept.2014] ). The child's testimony was competent evidence and was not required to be corroborated by other evidence ( see Matter of Marelyn Dalys C.-G. [Marcial C.], 113 A.D.3d 569, 979 N.Y.S.2d 519 [1st Dept.2014] ). In any event, the child's testimony was corroborated by medical records, which included the child's similar account of the sexual abuse and stated that she had symptoms of depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder.

We have considered the father's and grandmother's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Pedro G. v. S (In re Imani G.)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jul 7, 2015
130 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Pedro G. v. S (In re Imani G.)

Case Details

Full title:In re IMANI G., A Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Pedro G., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 7, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 456 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
130 A.D.3d 456
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5883