From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedraza v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 29, 2014
3:14-CV-02527-P-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2014)

Opinion

3:14-CV-02527-P-BK

08-29-2014

MARIO EDUARDO PEDRAZA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN MARSHALL, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is BARRED by the three-strike provision. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

SO ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

JORGE A. SOLIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Pedraza v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 29, 2014
3:14-CV-02527-P-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Pedraza v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:MARIO EDUARDO PEDRAZA, Plaintiff, v. JUSTIN MARSHALL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 29, 2014

Citations

3:14-CV-02527-P-BK (N.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2014)