From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedraza v. Manhattan Monster Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 10, 2024
23-cv-2596 (MKV) (VF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-2596 (MKV) (VF)

01-10-2024

JUAN PEDRAZA, Plaintiff, v. MANHATTAN MONSTER INC. d/b/a The Monster Bar, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge

As stated at the conference on January 9, 2024, the parties are directed to submit a joint status update by January 23, 2023.

The $500 cost incurred by Defendants for the failed deposition of Plaintiff will be split between the parties.

Plaintiff's request for costs for the failed Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant is DENIED without prejudice. The failed deposition lasted only 26 minutes and Defendants will provide an adequately prepared witness to be deposed again. Plaintiff can renew the motion, if there are grounds to do so, following the reopened 30(b)(6) deposition.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 47.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pedraza v. Manhattan Monster Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 10, 2024
23-cv-2596 (MKV) (VF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Pedraza v. Manhattan Monster Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JUAN PEDRAZA, Plaintiff, v. MANHATTAN MONSTER INC. d/b/a The Monster Bar…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 10, 2024

Citations

23-cv-2596 (MKV) (VF) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 10, 2024)