From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedraza v. Greater State Bank

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Nov 19, 2020
NUMBER 13-20-00249-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-20-00249-CV

11-19-2020

JOSE RIVERA PEDRAZA, Appellant, v. GREATER STATE BANK, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 8 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa

Appellant Jose Rivera Pedraza has filed an unopposed amended motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant asserts that all claims between appellant and appellee Greater State Bank have been fully and finally settled and requests that we dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having examined and fully considered appellant's unopposed amended motion to dismiss and the documents on file, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we grant the unopposed motion to dismiss and we dismiss the appeal. Appellant asserts that all costs on appeal should be taxed against him, and accordingly, the costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

LETICIA HINOJOSA

Justice Delivered and filed the 19th day of November, 2020.


Summaries of

Pedraza v. Greater State Bank

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Nov 19, 2020
NUMBER 13-20-00249-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Pedraza v. Greater State Bank

Case Details

Full title:JOSE RIVERA PEDRAZA, Appellant, v. GREATER STATE BANK, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

NUMBER 13-20-00249-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 19, 2020)