From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pedraza v. Dill

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 9, 2024
4:22-CV-01119-BSM-BBM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-CV-01119-BSM-BBM

08-09-2024

DANIEL PEDRAZA ADC #155040 PLAINTIFF v. DARREN DILL, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

After de novo review of the record, including Daniel Pedraza's objections [Doc. No. 55], United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore's partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 52] is adopted. Lerizza Nunag's motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 11] and Darren Dill's motion for partial summary judgment [Doc. No. 36] are granted. Pedraza's inadequate medical care claim against Nunag and his failure to protect claim against Dill are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The clerk is directed to terminate Nunag as a party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pedraza v. Dill

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 9, 2024
4:22-CV-01119-BSM-BBM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Pedraza v. Dill

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL PEDRAZA ADC #155040 PLAINTIFF v. DARREN DILL, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Aug 9, 2024

Citations

4:22-CV-01119-BSM-BBM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2024)