From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peddy v. L'Oreal U.S., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 15, 2020
18 CIVIL 7499 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 7499 (RA)

07-15-2020

CHRISTINE PEDDY, Plaintiff, v. L'OREAL USA, INC., Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 15, 2020, L'Oreal's motion for summary judgment is granted. Although the Court is sympathetic to Peddy's plight, she has not established that her termination was the result of unlawful age discrimination or retaliation; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

July 15, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Peddy v. L'Oreal U.S., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 15, 2020
18 CIVIL 7499 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2020)
Case details for

Peddy v. L'Oreal U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE PEDDY, Plaintiff, v. L'OREAL USA, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 15, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 7499 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2020)

Citing Cases

Vucinaj v. N.Y.C. Police Dep't

"[I]n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors to…

Massaro v. Bd. of Educ. of City Sch. Dist. of N.Y.

A retaliation claim under the ADEA follows the burden-shifting approach set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp.…