From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peckel v. Hakim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued January 30, 2001

February 26, 2001.

In a proceeding pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine the rights and interests in a parcel of real property, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered February 25, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered thereon on March 24, 2000.

Jeffrey Mintz, New York, N.Y. (Wylie Stecklow of counsel), for appellant.

John J. Gochman, Croton-on-Hudson, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: O'BRIEN, J.P., RITTER, ALTMAN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1]).

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (see, Hakim v. Peckel Family Limited Partnership, ___; ___ A.D.2d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 1999-10476, decided herewith]).


Summaries of

Peckel v. Hakim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2001
280 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Peckel v. Hakim

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN K. PECKEL, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. KAMRAN HAKIM, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 241