From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peck v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2023
2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF

08-09-2023

Frank M. Peck, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, et al., Respondents


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER THIRD-AMENDED PETITION TO AUGUST 8, 2023 [ECF NO. 134]

Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge

Respondents ask the court for a brief extension of time to file their answer to Frank M. Peck's third-amended 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Good cause appearing,

ECF No. 134.

Counsel for respondents explains that she had a family emergency last week and repeatedly received an error message when she attempted to log onto PACER to file for an extension.

IT IS ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer [ECF No. 134] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The deadline to reply is extended to August 8, 2023, making the answer filed on that date timely.


Summaries of

Peck v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 9, 2023
2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Peck v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Frank M. Peck, Petitioner v. Brian Williams, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 9, 2023

Citations

2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Aug. 9, 2023)