From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peck v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 6, 2023
2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF

02-06-2023

FRANK M. PECK, Petitioner v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS TO FEBRUARY 10,2023 [ECF NO. 123]

Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge.

Respondents ask the court for an extension of time to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss Frank M. Peck's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition due to counsel's illness. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' unopposed second motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss [ECF No. 123] is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. The deadline to reply is extended to February 10, 2023. The court is not likely to further extend this deadline.

ECF No. 123.


Summaries of

Peck v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 6, 2023
2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Peck v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:FRANK M. PECK, Petitioner v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 6, 2023

Citations

2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 6, 2023)