From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peck v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 5, 2023
2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2023)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF

01-05-2023

FRANK M. PECK, Petitioner v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS TO FEBRUARY 3, 2023 [ECF NO. 121]

Jennifer A. Dorsey, U.S. District Judge

Respondents ask the court for an extension of time to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss Frank M. Peck's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that respondents' unopposed motion for extension of time to file a reply in support of the motion to dismiss [ECF No. 121] is GRANTED. The deadline to reply is extended to February 3, 2023.

ECF No. 121.


Summaries of

Peck v. Williams

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 5, 2023
2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Peck v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:FRANK M. PECK, Petitioner v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 5, 2023

Citations

2:17-cv-01620-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 5, 2023)