From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peck v. Williams

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 18, 2020
No. 80632-COA (Nev. App. Dec. 18, 2020)

Opinion

No. 80632-COA

12-18-2020

FRANK MILFORD PECK, Appellant, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Frank Milford Peck appeals from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on August 17, 2017. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.

Peck claimed his rights to due process, free speech, and access to the courts were violated during a prison disciplinary hearing that resulted in a reprimand. We conclude the district court did not err by denying Peck's petition, because Peck did not lose statutory credits and his challenges to the conditions of confinement were not cognizable in a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See NRS 34.720; Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 490, 686 P.2d 250, 250 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Bulla cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Frank Milford Peck

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Peck v. Williams

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 18, 2020
No. 80632-COA (Nev. App. Dec. 18, 2020)
Case details for

Peck v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MILFORD PECK, Appellant, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 18, 2020

Citations

No. 80632-COA (Nev. App. Dec. 18, 2020)